SafeguardProperties.com

• NON-PAYMENT FOR COMPLETED WORK

  By: PFERRELL Mar 23, 2020
  • Message me
  • Post a comment

  • Follow Report

  • Respond

  WORK COMPLETED ON A TRASHOUT AND NO PAYMENT RECEIVED. FILED DISPUTE - DENIED. SENT FOR REVIEW - DENIED. NOW THEY REFUSE TO ANSWER .

  Show more...

  • My demands:

  • WOULD LIKE PAID FOR WORK COMPLETED

  • User Recommendation:

  • Stay away

  • Resolution:

  • Unresolved

  Complaint #: 52432
  • Also reported:

    • Agents:

    • Allan Jaffa

    • Managers:

    • William Sakes

    • Phone:

    • 216-739-2900

    • URL:

    • www.safeguardproperties.com

    • Monetary damages:

    • $3,000.00

  • Did you find this complaint useful?
  • Yes (4) No (1)
  • Leave a comment

• Safeguard Lossed Major Contract and Makes Field Contractors Pay by illegal Chargeback

  By: controlman Jul 07, 2015
  • Message me
  • Post a comment

  • Follow Report

  • Respond

  After almost 2000 or more Contractors completing thousands of dollars worth the work, Safeguard refused to pay Contractors for work properly completed. Safeguard produces faults complaints and files Chargebacks which the Contractor cannot fight even after numerous attempts by Contractor to demand payment for services rendered. Contractors have contacted Safeguard to demand payment only to received "NO" responses and additional chargebacks. Contractor have proof of services and/or work performed. Property liens are expected to be filed against Safeguard Properties, BAC and Fannie Mae.

  Show more...

  • My demands:

  • Payment for services rendered

  • User Recommendation:

  • Stay away

  • Resolution:

  • Unresolved

  Complaint #: 13390
  • Also reported:

    • Agents:

    • Brian Lamb

    • Managers:

    • Brian Lamb

    • Phone:

    • 800-852-8306

    • Monetary damages:

    • $2,500.00

  • Did you find this complaint useful?
  • Yes (21) No (2)
  • Leave a comment

• Safeguard Scam against Contractor-Invalid Chargeback

  By: controlman2013 Jun 04, 2015
  • Message me
  • Post a comment

  • Follow Report

  • Respond

  Safeguard Employee Patrick Barr chooses to enforce a chargeback against an active Vendor with Safeguard. The active Vendor chose to argue the chargeback for 4.5 weeks, the argument went unanswered for 4 weeks until the vendor went unpaid for 2 weeks for services rendered. Vendor is stall arguing the chargeback against Safeguard. Current argument is June of 2015. Chargeback is from Dec. 2014.

  Show more...

  • My demands:

  • Recovery of $2500 with late fees

  • User Recommendation:

  • Stay away

  • Resolution:

  • Unresolved

  Complaint #: 12971
  • Also reported:

    • Agents:

    • www.safeguardproperties.com

    • Managers:

    • Patrick Barr

    • Phone:

    • 800-852-8306

    • Monetary damages:

    • $2,500.00

  • Did you find this complaint useful?
  • Leave a comment

• Payroll Scam (Again)

  By: controlman Jun 03, 2014
  • Message me
  • Post a comment

  • Follow Report

  • Respond

  After several arguments with the company demanding payment for services already rendered, the company again gives my another (C/B) Chargeback for a grass cut I did a great job on. I did exactly as they asked me to do. Then they asked me did I get a POC (Point of Contact) for following the immediate directions at the time while at property. I would have gotten paid $38 for the grass cut, but got a chargeback $250 which is 3 months of grass cut for the property. Do they get three months grass cuts for free at this property. This company is a complete fraud. I have the photos to prove a did a really good job at this property. It's a good thing I know other ways of getting my money back from this theives.

  Show more...

  • My demands:

  • This company needs to go out of business

  • User Recommendation:

  • Stay away

  • Resolution:

  • Unresolved

  Complaint #: 7883
  • Also reported:

    • Monetary damages:

    • $40,000.00

  • Additional information

    Additional names reported: Elizabeth Fields

  • Did you find this complaint useful?
  • Yes (8) No (0)
  • Leave a comment

• Scammed Contractor out of money after services were already rendered.

  By: controlman2013 May 03, 2014
  • Message me
  • Post a comment

  • Follow Report

  • Respond

  After Contractor was expressly warned not to complete services for this company, the Contractor went ahead and performed services for 5 months. During this time, everything went well until Safeguard demanded Contractor to obtain one of three specific insurance companies authorized by Safeguard Properties. Contractor stated they have proper insurance for the industry which has been previously accepted by Safeguard. Since Safeguard has had issues getting paid for fraudulent claims, Safeguard found their specific insurance companies are much easier to get paid for these fraudulent claims. No claim was ever brought against this specific Contractor. After Contractor stated they did not have the funds to purchase the additional insurance due to slow payables by Safeguard, Safeguard started to remove assignments and re-assign to another Contractor further reducing funds. Several recent assignments completed by this specific Contractor, Safeguard stated they will not pay for services already rendered because of a missing photos support a ruler showing the grass height after the grass was already cut.
  Any Contractor nation-wide who chooses to perform services for Safeguard Properties, don't say you were not pre-warned to stay away. Contractor does plan to file liens against property. If Contractors insist on performing services for Safeguard Properties, you deserve what you get just like this company who was warned to stay way.

  Show more...

  • My demands:

  • Payment for services rendered

  • User Recommendation:

  • Stay away

  • Resolution:

  • Unresolved

  Complaint #: 7385
  • Also reported:

    • Monetary damages:

    • $9,500.00

  • Additional information

    Additional names reported: Robert Kline

  • Did you find this complaint useful?
  • Yes (6) No (0)
  • Leave a comment

• Scam Alerts-see all previous postings

  By: controlman Mar 20, 2014
  • Message me
  • Post a comment

  • Follow Report

  • Respond

  On 03.20.2014, [email address omitted by ScamGuard] received an email from a Contractor who works for a Management Contractor of Safeguard Properties. These reports are being filed by Matthew Close with National Fraud Alerts a.k.a. www.nationalfraudalerts.com. My apologies goes out to the sub-Contractor who shares my name but not same spelling. Safeguard contacted this individual directly over this posting to resolve the issue related to this posting and stated they would wait to hear back from me. If any employee of Safeguard Properties wishes to contact Matthew Close with National Fraud Alerts, please email me directly at the email address above.
  Again, my posting is correct and I stand behind my statements. I will again post another scam related to this topic to either enforce Safeguard Properties to stop enforcing Contractors to purchase their monopolizing insurance company and enforce free and open enterprise. Safeguard already knows they are under the gun and may be loosing they're property portfolios due to the amount of fraud and scam filings against them.
  I'll make this simple. Safeguard is getting nervous. Do not work for this company. They do not know how to respect their Contractors for enforce free open business enterprise based on the insurance mandates. Safeguard has the right to do business with who they wish and Contractor can retain the right not to work for Safeguard, however, in the event Contractors have been contracted with Safeguard for a period of time without problems, why change the rules in the middle of a Contract. There is a specific reason Safeguard is enforcing the insurance mandates, Safeguard cannot get honest legitimate insurance companies to pay up of fraudulent claims. Insurance companies outside Safeguard realm enforce Safeguard to show proof of why the claims need to be paid. Safeguard does not want the challenge, hence the new mandate to purchase they're mandated insurance.

  Show more...

  • My demands:

  • Policy change

  • User Recommendation:

  • Stay away

  • Resolution:

  • Unresolved

  Complaint #: 6223
  • Also reported:

    • Monetary damages:

    • $1,800.00

  • Did you find this complaint useful?
  • Yes (8) No (0)
  • Leave a comment

• ‹‹ previous
• 1
• 2
• next ››